![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Research |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Specifically, we will test the hypothesis of endogenous recruitment to natal streams. We will identify the elemental fingerprints of larvae originating from rivers on the West Coast using otolith microchemistry techniques to directly measure the dispersal of individual larvae. Laser ablation inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry can detect trace element inclusions in fish otoliths (ear bones). The concentration of selected elements within the otolith (the elemental fingerprint) can be used to discriminate among groups of fish that have spent at least part of their lives in different environments. Diadromous galaxiids are ideal models for these techniques because the individual rivers in which they originate have distinctive chemical composition, due to historical land use practices such as mining and agriculture, which is encoded within the elemental fingerprints of otoliths. These are extractable from all life stages from eggs to adults, which can be readily captured and analysed. By categorising streams and populations these fingerprints allow a determination of the natal source of returning juveniles. This will allow us to answer questions like - What is the source of whitebait entering any particular river? Are the whitebait entering a river a product of that river or that region? Further analysis of otolith microchemistry will also determine if galaxiid larva develop nearshore or in the open ocean. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fig
4. from Hickford, M. J. H. and Schiel, D. R. (2003). Comparative
dispersal of larvae from demersal versus pelagic spawning fishes. Mar. Ecol.
Prog. Ser. 252: 255-271).). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Adult
Retropinna retropinna. (Photo by RM McDowall). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Photo
of adult Galaxias maculatus (Photo by RM McDowall). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| The differing
spatial distributions of these two families may reflect contrasting needs
in terms of using the planktonic phase as a dispersal mechanism. The galaxiids,
like the retropinnids, are diadromous. However, they are mostly amphidromous.
The larvae of amphidromous species migrate to sea soon after hatching to
feed and grow to a post-larval stage. Juveniles then migrate back into freshwater
where most somatic growth, as well as sexual maturation and reproduction,
occurs. For anadromous species like the retropinnids, most feeding and growth
is at sea prior to the migration of fully-grown adult fish into freshwater
to reproduce. Retropinnids are short-lived (1-2 years) and can disperse
widely both as juveniles and adults during their extended period at sea.
Most of the amphidromous galaxiid species are much longer-lived (up to 27
years for Galaxias argenteus), and are likely to use their planktonic phase
as a dispersal mechanism so that post-larval stages can restore populations
in perturbed river systems. The positioning of galaxiid ichthyoplankton
further from shore may aid in this dispersal. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Galaxias
argenteus |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||